Example group · 6 comparisons

Social proof interface examples

Uses claimed behaviour, approval or popularity among other people to accelerate or steer a decision.

Select one example to inspect the complete problematic and neutral HTML interfaces. These fictional comparisons support learning and review. The group name is not an EU legal category, and visual similarity alone establishes no infringement.

Activity messages

Randomised recent-purchase notification

Product pagePricing

A fictional store displays “12 people bought this in the last hour” using a random number unrelated to completed orders.

Open this example

Activity messages

Fabricated named signup notification

Course landing pagePricing

A fictional course page rotates messages such as “Mia from Berlin just enrolled” using invented names and locations rather than completed enrolments.

Open this example

Popularity claims

“Most popular” has no defined metric

Subscription plansPricing

A fictional service labels its highest-margin plan “Most popular” without recording sales, selection period or the population being measured.

Open this example

Popularity claims

Bestseller badge follows margin rather than sales

Marketplace resultsPricing

A fictional marketplace assigns “Bestseller” to whichever item yields the highest commission, regardless of units sold.

Open this example

Testimonials or endorsements

Paid creator recommendation lacks disclosure

Social product landing pagePricing

A fictional creator calls a skincare product a personal favourite and links to purchase without disclosing payment until the bottom of a collapsed caption.

Open this example

Testimonials or endorsements

Employee review presented as independent expertise

Software comparison pagePricing

A fictional software company publishes a five-star quote from its product manager under an “Independent experts recommend” heading.

Open this example
Sources used across this example group

Evidence base

Sources

  1. Dark commercial patternsOrganisation for Economic Co-operation and Development · Secondary · checked 2026-09-14 · OECD Digital Economy Papers No. 336
  2. Unfair Commercial Practices DirectiveEuropean Parliament and Council of the European Union · Primary · checked 2026-08-09 · Directive 2005/29/EC; CELEX 02005L0029-20220528