Forced disclosure or excessive data request
Excessive details for product comparison
A fictional comparison tool requires occupation, exact birth date, mobile number and marketing preference before showing the plans that are available in a postcode.
Individual HTML example · Forced action
A fictional furniture shop requires a visitor to disclose an exact birth date and mobile number before showing whether delivery is available to the entered postcode.
This is an original fictional comparison. It depicts no real company and is not a legal finding or safe harbour.
A fictional furniture shop requires a visitor to disclose an exact birth date and mobile number before showing whether delivery is available to the entered postcode.
Tell us who you are first. Birth date and mobile number block a postcode-based availability estimate.. Exact date of birth: Enter exact date of birth. Mobile number: Enter mobile number. Delivery postcode: Enter delivery postcode. Submit personal details
Check delivery availability. The estimate uses the postcode; contact details remain optional until booking.. Delivery postcode: Enter delivery postcode. Show delivery estimate. Purpose and refusal effect, expanded: The form explains why “Show delivery estimate” is requested and what happens if it is not used.
Why the first version can mislead: The additional dependency controls access to the pricing goal. The panel states: “Birth date and mobile number block a postcode-based availability estimate.” Reviewers need to establish whether “Submit personal details” is necessary for the selected task or pressures the user into a separable action. The visitor must disclose identity and contact information that is unrelated to a preliminary delivery-availability check.
What a fairer design does: Use the postcode for the estimate, explain any genuinely necessary field and defer contact details until the visitor asks to book or save it.
Complete pattern context
Access or progression is conditioned on disclosing personal information that appears unnecessary, excessive or used for an insufficiently explained secondary purpose. The label describes a recurring design mechanism; whether a particular implementation is harmful or unlawful depends on the complete journey, audience, evidence and rules within scope.
The full guide explains inclusion and exclusion criteria, harms, fair design principles, evidence questions and the relevant EU legal information layers. The example page isolates one scenario so it can be shared and discussed without reproducing the complete library on one page.
Continue comparing
Forced disclosure or excessive data request
A fictional comparison tool requires occupation, exact birth date, mobile number and marketing preference before showing the plans that are available in a postcode.
Automatic attention capture
A fictional video service starts another clip when a user’s chosen twenty-minute limit is reached and hides the leave action behind a full-screen recommendation.
Automatic attention capture
A fictional marketplace continuously inserts new products and removes pagination, position and viewed-item markers while promotional prompts follow the shopper.
Evidence base