<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><title>Digital Fairness Act Monitor: updates and research explained</title><id>https://digital-fairness-act.eu/</id><link href="https://digital-fairness-act.eu/atom.xml" rel="self"/><author><name>Flowlane</name><uri>https://digital-fairness-act.eu/about/</uri></author><updated>2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z</updated><entry><title>Digital Fairness Act status: initial verified baseline</title><id>https://digital-fairness-act.eu/updates/initial-status-review/</id><link href="https://digital-fairness-act.eu/updates/initial-status-review/"/><published>2026-08-09T00:00:00.000Z</published><updated>2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z</updated><summary>A source-led baseline separating current EU law, the announced Digital Fairness Act initiative, matters under consideration and questions that remain open.</summary></entry><entry><title>Why researchers needed an ontology for dark patterns</title><id>https://digital-fairness-act.eu/research/dark-pattern-ontology/</id><link href="https://digital-fairness-act.eu/research/dark-pattern-ontology/"/><published>2026-08-10T00:00:00.000Z</published><updated>2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z</updated><summary>How the CHI 2024 dark-pattern ontology connects taxonomies and three levels of abstraction, including a documented count discrepancy and limits on legal conclusions.</summary></entry><entry><title>What a crawl of 11,000 shopping sites taught researchers about dark patterns</title><id>https://digital-fairness-act.eu/research/dark-patterns-at-scale/</id><link href="https://digital-fairness-act.eu/research/dark-patterns-at-scale/"/><published>2026-08-10T00:00:00.000Z</published><updated>2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z</updated><summary>The landmark 2019 web-crawl study explained: how researchers found 1,818 dark-pattern instances, what automation could see and what the crawl could not prove.</summary></entry><entry><title>The EDPB’s deceptive-design guide is practical, but narrower than it looks</title><id>https://digital-fairness-act.eu/research/edpb-deceptive-design-guidelines/</id><link href="https://digital-fairness-act.eu/research/edpb-deceptive-design-guidelines/"/><published>2026-08-10T00:00:00.000Z</published><updated>2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z</updated><summary>A readable guide to the EDPB’s six deceptive-design categories, social-media lifecycle examples and the boundary between GDPR guidance and a future DFA.</summary></entry><entry><title>Why “97% of popular sites” does not mean 97% were unlawful</title><id>https://digital-fairness-act.eu/research/eu-behavioural-study-dark-patterns/</id><link href="https://digital-fairness-act.eu/research/eu-behavioural-study-dark-patterns/"/><published>2026-08-10T00:00:00.000Z</published><updated>2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z</updated><summary>A plain-English guide to the European Commission’s 2022 behavioural study, its striking prevalence finding and the limits of the often-quoted 97% figure.</summary></entry><entry><title>AI agents can recognise a dark pattern, and still follow it</title><id>https://digital-fairness-act.eu/research/gui-agents-dark-patterns/</id><link href="https://digital-fairness-act.eu/research/gui-agents-dark-patterns/"/><published>2026-08-10T00:00:00.000Z</published><updated>2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z</updated><summary>A 2026 CHI study tested people, GUI agents and human-agent teams across 16 dark-pattern types, revealing procedural blind spots and limits to oversight.</summary></entry><entry><title>Subtle dark patterns can be more dangerous than obvious ones</title><id>https://digital-fairness-act.eu/research/shining-light-experiments/</id><link href="https://digital-fairness-act.eu/research/shining-light-experiments/"/><published>2026-08-10T00:00:00.000Z</published><updated>2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z</updated><summary>Two large experiments found that dark patterns changed sign-up behaviour, and that mild designs could steer people without provoking the same backlash as aggressive tactics.</summary></entry></feed>